غزوہ فتح مکہ: حدیث کی معنوی روایت اور قیام کی مدت کا تحقیقی جائزہ

The Conquest of Makkah: A Research Review of Hadith Narration in Meaning and the Duration of the Stay

Authors

  • Dr. Ayesha Tariq Assistant Professor, Khayaban E Sir Syed College for Women Rawalpindi.
  • Dr. Shaista Jabeen Assistant Professor, Govt. Graduate College for women Jhang.

Keywords:

Hadith, Islamic Law, transmitted, narration by words (Riwayat billafz, narration in the meaning (Riwayat bilmana), Traditionalists, conditions, Orientalists, non-muslims, doubts, so-called muslims.

Abstract

Hadith is the second main source of Islamic Law, valid forever. Hadith was transmitted in two ways. One is narration by words (Riwayat billafz) and the other is narration in the meaning (Riwayat bilmana). One group of Traditionalists opposes Hadith’s narration in the meaning while the other gives permission with some conditions.Orientalists have made objection on the narration of Hadith in the meaning. Side by side the non-muslims, one group from our so-called muslims claim the authenticity of Hadith. The study will certainly disperse the doubts and set aside the wrong impression regarding Hadith’s narration in the meaning. This article deals with the above mentioned issue in detail.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-27

How to Cite

Dr. Ayesha Tariq, & Dr. Shaista Jabeen. (2024). غزوہ فتح مکہ: حدیث کی معنوی روایت اور قیام کی مدت کا تحقیقی جائزہ : The Conquest of Makkah: A Research Review of Hadith Narration in Meaning and the Duration of the Stay. International Research Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies, 4(1), 772–783. Retrieved from https://irjais.com/index.php/irjais/article/view/210

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): (Jan-Jun 2024)

Section

Urdu